Statement of the Problem and Sources – Updated

The Relationship Between the Number of Hours of Computer Usage and Attention Span Towards Class Discussion of Second Year Bachelor of Science in Computer Science Students of University of the Philippines – Cebu College (A.Y. 2011 – 2012)
Statement of the Problem
             The study aims to determine the relationship between the number of hours spent in using the computer and how it affects the degree of attention span towards class discussion of second year Computer Science students A.Y. 2011-2012.
                     Specifically, this study aims to:
1. To know the significance of having a high level of attention span.
2. To evaluate the disadvantages and advantages of having a low level of attention span.
3. To recognize direct effects of computer to student’s attention.
4. To identify other factors that may/might have caused other effects on attention span.
Research Paper
Aborque, A., Blasca, R., & Gonzales, M.J. (2004) Attitude and dependency level towards the internet of Mass Communication and Computer Engineering students in Cebu. University of the Philippines – Cebu College.
Fairlie, R. (2003). The effects of home computers on school enrollment. Retrieved from http://www2.ucsc.edu/cjtc/docs/r_schoolcomp6.pdf
Hurlbert, A. & Poggio, T. (1986). Visual attention in brains and computers. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.  Retrieved from  http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/5514
Quijano, M. (2000). The use of internet and its influence in the social and mass media behaviors of selected high school and college students of Cebu City. University of the Philippines – Cebu College.
The effects of computers on workplace stress, job security and work interest in Canada. (2002). Retrieved from Human Resources and Skills Development Canada –  http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/eng/cs/sp/hrsd/prc/publications/research/2002-000146/page03.shtml
Books
Mooray, N. (1969). Listening and Attention. Great Britain: C. Nicholls and Company Ltd.
Goldberg, R. (1991). Sit down and pay attention. Wahington, DC: The Psychiatric Institutes of America (PIA) Press.
Johnson, A., & Proctor, R. (2004). Attention: Theory and practice. United States of America: Sage Publications, Inc. Retrieved from http://books.google.com.ph/books?id=Wwu4W_aO8oAC&printsec=frontcover&dq=attention&hl=en&ei=svkiTs2-C4LLmAXZyYyeAw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CC0Q6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false
Scholarly Journals
Angelo, T. (2008, July 14). Lecturing for learning: Attention span . Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYHWzPidMmo
Barra, L. (2004). What are our children eating? Children’s nutrition knowledge and the relationship between nutritional intake and attention. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 37(1), pp. 45-61.
Carr, N. (2010). The web shatters focus, rewires brains. Wired. Retrieved from http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/05/ff_nicholas_carr/
Egeth, H., & Yantis, S. (1997). Visual attention, control, representation and time course. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, pp. 269-297.
Elias, M. (2005, March 30). So much media, so little attention span. USA Today. Retrieved from http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2005-03-30-kids-attention_x.htm
Fuzzy brain? Improve your attention span.  (2008, November 14). CNN Health. Retrieved from http://articles.cnn.com/2008-11-14/health/rs.increase.your.attention.span_1_dopamine-prefrontal-cortex-concentration?_s=PM:HEALTH
Gravoso, S., Pasa, A., Labra, J., & Mari, T. (2001). Transmitting information or engaging in problem exploration? An examination of the effects of educational media designs on student’s learning outcomes.Philippine Journal of Psychology, 34(2), pp. 145-161.
Healey, M. K., & Miyake, A. (2009). The role of attention during retrieval in working-memory span: a dual-task study. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 62(4), 733-745. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18720294
How TV can ‘rewire’ brains of tiny tots.  (2004, April 18). The Washington Times. Retrieved from http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2004/apr/18/20040418-102127-5656r/
Logon, G. (2004). Culmulative progress in formal theories of attention.Annual Review of Psychology, 55, pp. 207-234.
Pashler, H., Johnston, J., & Ruthruff, E. (2001). Attention and performance.Annual Review of Psychology, 52, pp. 629-651.
Shirky, C. (2010). Cognitive Surplus: Creativity and generosity in a connected     age. Wall Street Journal, p W1. Retrieved from http://ebookbrowse.com/shortened-attention-span-in-the-internet-era-doc-d65908860
Advertisements
Published in: on July 24, 2011 at 3:03 pm  Leave a Comment  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://ediyomente.wordpress.com/2011/07/24/statement-of-the-problem-and-sources-updated/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: